How Safe is Fish to Eat?
By Dr. Randi Fredricks, Ph.D.
How safe are the fish you eat? The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued a warning that women
who are pregnant or of child-bearing age and young children should minimize consumption of certain saltwater
fish because of potential mercury exposure. Several Battelle studies are helping to determine just how
widespread the incidence of mercury in fish really is.
Mercury occurs naturally in the environment, but unnatural releases by humans via industrial wastes and fossil
fuels elevate mercury levels. Once in the environment, mercury can be converted by bacteria into methylmercury,
a toxic form that can be highly concentrated in fish. The FDA has set an overall action level for methylmercury
in seafood at 1 part per million. The agency does not routinely test for mercury in fish, relying instead on
industry self-policing.
When the ABC news program 20/20 conducted its own investigation of mercury in supermarket fish, it received help
from Battelle, known for its ability to measure trace-level amounts of mercury. Of 40 samples of fresh shark,
swordfish, and tuna, 50 percent of the shark and over 75 percent of the swordfish failed the FDA criterion.
Two of the swordfish samples had mercury levels triple the FDA limit. The tuna samples were below the FDA limit.
Standard acceptable levels for mercury in freshwater fish have not been established because freshwater species
are regulated by individual states. Battelle is helping to determine a more definitive answer through the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) National Fish Monitoring Study. In this four-year program, game and
bottom-dwelling fish from approximately 500 lakes and reservoirs are being collected and sent to Battelle for
analysis of mercury as well as arsenic. There has been a wide range of results so far.
Battelle, which developed EPA-approved speciation techniques allowing measurement of mercury in the
subpart-per-trillion range and arsenic in the subpart-per-billion range, has conducted several other relevant
studies. In a six-year EPA study on the Florida Everglades, Battelle analyzed mercury in water, sediment,
soil, vegetation, and tissue samples to better understand how mercury changes under different environmental
conditions. Additionally, in two separate studies, Battelle examined fish and hair samples to estimate risk
of mercury and arsenic poisoning to Alaskan natives from fish consumption and proximity to gold dredge operations.
For the government of Hong Kong, Battelle addressed potential food-web transfer of arsenic to humans through
consumption of seafood.
The government’s general recommendation for the majority of Americans is yes, fish is good for you, with the
majority of fish on the market falling within the FDA limit for mercury. Consumers can check with state or
local governments for advisories that provide information on where elevated levels of mercury or arsenic
might be a problem.
References (To view, roll mouse over the "References" heading; to hide, click on the heading)
Hughner, R. S., Maher, J. K., & Childs, N. M. (2008). Review of food policy and consumer issues of mercury in fish. J Am Coll Nutr, 27(2), 185-194.
Crépet, A., Harari-Kermadec, H., & Tressou, J. (2008). Using empirical likelihood to combine data: Application to food risk assessment. Biometrics, 65(1), 257-266.
Tacon, A. G., & Metian, M. (2008). Aquaculture feed and food safety. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1140, 50-59.